IGT Facing Lawsuit for Allegedly Rigging Games

Article by : Erik Gibbs Nov 28, 2024

• 
• 

A new lawsuit filed on November 21 targets International Game Technology (IGT) and major casino operators, accusing them of deceptive practices involving Wheel of Fortune-themed electronic gaming machines. This represents other companies in this industry again becoming involved in legal matters for allegedly failing to conduct operations properly. 

The plaintiffs, representing four different states, argue that the machines falsely appear to provide fair odds of winning while allegedly being programmed to favor lower payouts. The case, brought under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), also names MGM Resorts International, Bally’s Corporation, and Penn Entertainment as defendants.

The lawsuit focuses on the bonus wheel feature of the Wheel of Fortune machines, which displays equally sized segments representing various cash prizes. Plaintiffs claim the feature is misleading, alleging the wheel’s outcomes are pre-determined by an internal computer that disproportionately lands on lower-value segments. They liken this to a rigged roulette wheel, designed to deceive players into thinking they have an equal chance at all outcomes.

IGT’s long-standing use of the Wheel of Fortune brand is a central element of the complaint. Since launching these themed machines in 1997, the company has heavily marketed its connection to the iconic game show, renewing its licensing agreement with Sony Pictures Television earlier this year. 

The machines incorporate the voices of the show’s hosts, Vanna White and Pat Sajak, along with signature sound effects, creating an impression of fairness and randomness. Plaintiffs argue this branding exploits player trust while masking the alleged rigged mechanics.

The lawsuit further accuses IGT and the casinos of profiting billions from players through fraudulent and deceptive tactics. The plaintiffs seek compensatory damages and a requirement for the defendants to transparently disclose the actual odds associated with the bonus wheel feature. They claim that the machines entice players to continue gambling with an illusion of substantial potential winnings, driving up casino revenue at the expense of consumers.

Filed in the US District Court for the District of Nevada, the lawsuit also aims for class-action status and a jury trial. It alleges violations of RICO and state-level fraud laws, signaling significant legal implications if the claims hold up in court.

Neither IGT nor the named casinos have publicly responded to the allegations. When approached for comment, an IGT spokesperson declined, citing the company’s policy of not discussing ongoing litigation. This case shines a spotlight on practices within the gaming industry, raising questions about fairness, transparency, and consumer protection as it progresses through the legal system.